The Community Maturity Model

by Rachel Happe on June 16, 2009

Community management is becoming a lot more common at all sorts of organizations – driven by adoption of people doing more and more online and the social media tools that allow for easy conversation and collaboration. As that happens, however, there is a lot of friction due to lack of standards – not just technical standards but also standard expectations and understanding of what community management is and what should be expected of it.

This lack of standards is causing a lot of friction and frustration – particularly for community managers themselves. Companies have bought in to social media and online community to the extent that they think it’s important and have put some resources into funding community management positions and tools to enable community but there is still a lot of uncertainty about what to expect of both the roles and the tools. That lack of clear articulation can create a lot of pressure and/or missed expectations for community managers.

One of our missions at The Community Roundtable is to further the discipline of community management – not just in our own community but more broadly in the marketplace. Our first effort to define the discipline is our Community Maturity Model:

This model does two things. First, it defines the eight competencies we think are required for successful community management. Second, it attempts – at a high level – to articulate how these competencies progress from organizations without community management that are still highly hierarchical to those that have embraced a networked business ecosystem approach to their entire organization. We use this model in a number of ways:

  • As a mental model for understanding all the areas and skill sets required for community management and hopefully, to remind community managers that it is about assembling a internal team to gather all the required skills – not to try and be the expert in all of them individually
  • As a tool for community managers to educate and set the expectations of colleagues and advocates within the organization
  • As a roadmap for community managers looking to understand what is important to do given their current state of evolution, and in what order
  • To organize content, programing, and conversations within The Community Roundtable
  • As a way to categorize and find best practices and case studies – we will be working with our members on both Quick Cases (techniques and methodologies) as well as full case studies and be matching those with the appropriate box on the matrix
  • As a good model over the long term to develop training

While the Community Maturity Model is something that is core to our services, we also want to ‘open source’ it for those that find it useful.  Feel free to use it either for internal or external presentations – we just ask that you attribute it back to The Community Roundtable.

{ 20 trackbacks }

Twitter convenience vs. security - a cautionary tale | Practical Conversations
June 22, 2009 at 9:15 am
Roundtable Call: Tribalization of Business Study
July 7, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Online Community Management Tips & Resources | I Said, OK
August 21, 2009 at 1:17 pm
Community Management Tips & Resources | Babyparentingguide.net-Articles View
August 22, 2009 at 12:05 am
Thoughts on the Emerging Discipline of Community Management
October 1, 2009 at 8:26 am
Collaboration Strategy Shortcomings? Whack the Community Manager | Collaboration 2.0 | ZDNet.com
October 3, 2009 at 2:33 pm
ViNT // Vision - Inspiration - Navigation - Trends » The Community Maturity Model
October 11, 2009 at 10:33 am
Community Management Tips & Resources | Babynamesportaldel.net/-Articles Scan
October 17, 2009 at 1:39 pm
Customer Competencies, Co-Creation, and Brand Communities « Skilful Minds
October 20, 2009 at 2:17 pm
Community Management in EMS
October 28, 2009 at 2:06 am
Customer Competencies, Co-Creation, and Brand Communities | Digital Asset Management
November 3, 2009 at 3:09 am
Cultivating the Community Managers
November 3, 2009 at 8:41 am
Events in November & December
November 9, 2009 at 1:42 pm
Outbound Community Building: How Do You Know Where To Be? | Social Silk
November 19, 2009 at 6:51 pm
What is Community? – Serial Networking By Christine Major @cmajor
November 27, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Building and Sustaining Brand Communities
February 3, 2010 at 6:46 am
The State of Community Management 2010
March 1, 2010 at 9:59 am
Why Companies Should Leverage The Community Roundtable | a thousand cuts :: adam cohen's blog
March 1, 2010 at 10:30 am
The Community Roundtable
March 6, 2010 at 8:54 am
What Are the Biggest Use Cases For Corporate Online Communities? | 2020 Social: Because Business is Social
March 7, 2010 at 10:06 am

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Sarah June 17, 2009 at 2:40 pm

Rachel,

This looks like a great resource, but the font size is so small it’s very difficult to read. Can you post a larger version and/or pdf to download and use?

Thanks!

Reply

2 rhappe June 17, 2009 at 2:44 pm

Hi Sarah -

If you right click on the image and download it, the original size is larger.

Thanks for stopping by!

Reply

3 Jim Storer June 17, 2009 at 11:09 pm

I also added the Community Maturity Model to Flickr, so you can download the original size and/or grab the embed code to include it on your own blog/web site. You can find it here:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jstorerj/3637035309/

Reply

4 Rolando Peralta June 19, 2009 at 10:12 am

thanks a lot for sharing it! it looks great! I just want to comment about the Community Management and Metrics compentencies.
Are you suggesting that a network need much more management than its opposite? and also, suggesting that a measurement of a network has to be attached to business metrics? Wouldn’t be the case for another level of community?
thanks again!
cheers,

Reply

5 rhappe June 19, 2009 at 10:42 am

Hi Rolando -
Thanks for stopping by and for the question. We are currently working on better & deeper definitions for what we mean but while in the stages before a company becomes truly networked, metrics are isolated to supporting one business process vs. in a networked business the whole business becomes social and the communities are set up to support cross-functional goals. Does that makes sense? In many cases, in immature implementations, community metrics don’t match the business process metrics at all but as the initiatives becomes more mature, they do align.

Reply

6 Steve Hopkins July 1, 2009 at 9:08 pm

Hi guys,

Great framework. I will start incorporating this into my thinking. A few notes:

1) I like how it create a way for you to step through where your organisation is currently at and then work on progressing each piece of the puzzle. I think it’s naive to believe that all organisations should ‘just get it and be a networked’ organisation. At the moment, I believe there are very few individuals, let alone organisations, that have successfully moved to being fully networked as you describe it.

2) I like how this can be layered onto existing social media strategic constructs, such as the Forrester POST methodology, which I have liked and used many times.

3) Do you have at your disposal a list of descriptive traits that occur at each level? This can really help people identify where their organisation is at currently. Identifying this (as an indication of how ready each organisation is for change) can be a real key to unlock the framework and make it eminently more useful.

Just some thoughts – love your work! Many thanks.

Steve

Reply

7 rhappe July 2, 2009 at 10:14 am

Hi Steve -
Thanks for the comment and feedback – the model is primarily to help companies have the conversation about expectations, investment, resources, etc. and as a guide to helping build their internal community/social roadmap. For me, it’s also an important reminder for community managers that they cannot do it all (although it is tempting to try) – that they need to bring in expertise from around their organization to make their initiatives successful.

There’s not reason not to combine this with a construct like POST – we are trying to take the discipline of community management a step further in definition and start to fill in content, best practices, & guidelines for each part of the Community Maturity Model grid. As you suggest, we need to start with descriptive traits and validation points so companies can self-assess. We are not there yet but have kicked off an effort with our members to start that work as we would like to bring their experience to bear. We would love to hear any thoughts you have on the topic too!

Thanks for stopping by – glad you found the framework useful!

Rachel

Reply

8 Bob Duffy March 1, 2010 at 10:47 am

Nice post and graphic. I’ve been training and working on the Community Management model myself. This is very robust. I’d love to see examples of managers and communities across the maturity graph.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: