vicodin

Cultivating the Community Managers

by Rachel Happe on November 3, 2009

desertRecently we’ve been hearing from a lot of recruiters looking for social media and community professionals but more than that we’re hearing from a lot of community managers who are getting laid off, leaving voluntarily, or considering making a move.  While the social software market itself is going through the Trough of Disillusionment, one of the biggest risks happening right now is to community managers. What’s interesting to me is that a lot of the churn is going on with some of the best community managers in the business and the ones who have the most experience.  They are restless, isolated, frustrated, and unsatisfied. They are getting more support and recognition for their work externally than they do within their own organizations. They are looking for really rewarding challenges and an environment where they can do innovative and ground-breaking work. They are in organizations that still view them as their social media or community outpost but they are not ready to think about social media or community as a business strategy that incorporates more of the organization – effectively leaving them in the desert with no water.

Community managers – as outposts – face a lot of stress. They are seeing on a daily basis how the business needs to change to support their constituents and yet they don’t have the internal decision-making chain listening to them at a high enough level to actually change the business.  They are often seen as the person who will change the culture by making a company more ‘social’ but as anyone with change management experience knows, putting that responsibility on any one person is enormously unfair. In the worst scenario and particularly with Enterprise 2.0 initiatives started in IT groups, community management falls to a project manager as  a ‘part-time’ responsibility and the person in the role has no realistic hope of tackling the responsibilities comprehensively – but not for lack of interest or enthusiasm. So social initiatives linger, fall apart, or create friction within the organization that it cannot be easily addressed because of lack of a broad strategy and commitment.  Oliver Marks talks about this in his post Collaboration Strategy Shortcomings: Whack the Community Manager.

One of the reasons we put together the Community Maturity Model itself is to give organizations and community managers themselves a framework for thinking about how the business needs to change to incorporate more voices – not just how to manage the community itself.  Community managers will always be a vital link to facilitate the conversation between the business and the consistent base – whether that is customers, employees, or partners – but they need an organizations that supports them and their role. They need peers and resources since this is an emerging discipline.  They need executive sponsors who understand and champion a social business strategy – and protects the community initiative while it incubates because communities do not grow and mature in the same way as other types of operational programs. When those conditions are not present – and they are lacking in some of the very companies we champion as ‘visionaries’ in the social space – they risk losing the people who best understand how to execute community management. That loss can set companies back years. Supporting community managers – and giving them the resources to learn, experiment, and grow – whether that is internal mentorship at the executive level, budget for conferences and resources like The Community Roundtable, or more staff to help give them space to think more strategically, companies need to do better by their community managers if they want to succeed in this brave new information evnironment.

While all companies have challenges supporting and growing a new discipline we do see some great examples of companies thinking strategically about community – companies like SAP, EMC, IBM, Radian6, Zappos, and EDR.  If you are interested in how business is evolving they are companies worth watching and not coincidentally, most of them participate widely in conferences and with us and the individuals involved are open and accessible so ask, listen, & learn from them. They are not without challenges but they are committed to learning and growing. And if you are interested in what The Community Roundtable offers, find out more about membership here.

What’s the biggest challenge you expect companies to face as they add community and social programs to their existing business processes? What can they do to better support community managers during that transition? What resources and support systems do you find invaluable?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
  • Rachel Makool

    Rachel,
    Really well written! I completely agree with your observations. Having led a team of Community professionals, I see many of them feeling disheartened about the lack of great opportunities for Community leadership in companies right now. Some of them have moved on to different positions just so they have a job. My more senior team members were hoping for Director positions that are few and hard to find.

    I also see and hear about great strategic people who are put in lower level positions and asked to manage it all…strategy, feedback and moderation of forums. They are expected to be change agents in companies that really aren’t ready to embrace thinking differently about how to work with customers. Many companies are still holding on to the notion that Community is a way to cut down on Customer Support costs without understanding how to think of it strategically and holistically for the business.

    I do believe that many of us need to show leadership in this area and continue to have conversations with executives and others about the value of engagement with customers. People shouldn’t give up yet especially during a tough economic climate. It’s posts like this that lead the way!

  • http://www.community-roundtable.com Rachel Happe

    Thanks Rachel for sharing your perspective – it is up to us as community managers to better articulate what the role means, what community management is capable of, and why it is important. But as you suggest, it’s a two way street – others need to be open to hearing and changing in order to really take advantage of the opportunity. You have been instrumental in leading the conversation so please keep at it!

  • http://blog.angelaconnor.com Angela Connor

    I know what this burnout feels like first hand and have spoken to many others who feel used and abused and misunderstood. I think companies need to first and foremost work diligently to determine their needs. Once they do that, they can provide real expectations. And if they don’t know what those expectations are or what they should be, be honest and start a dialogue. Community managers are resourceful and innovative. Tap into that!

  • http://www.community-roundtable.com Rachel Happe

    Hi Angela -

    Thanks for the comment – I think you are right on that a lot of the strain comes from unarticulated expectations. Because the role is unfamiliar to many organizations, they don’t have established expectations (either formal or informal). We’re happy to see people like you and other leaders in the space talking about it more because I think that’s what starts to give others a realistic concept of what community management can be – and what some of the issues are.

  • Barbara O’Connell

    I’ve unofficially been a community manager for years, but always had trouble convincing management that this is a worthy full-time job. I would love to enter an organization that truly values its significance. I would love tips on how to effect this change or what training will better position folks like me to turn this into a full-time gig.

  • http://www.online-communities.net Benoît Faverial

    The biggest challenge ? Modifications in the business processes & decision making due to a Community Manager.

    As Community Management spreaded out from internet & geeks culture, we have to face now the challenges of evangelizing companies who don’t really know what “Customer Relation 2.0″ or “Buzz” mean.
    What I hear from french colleagues right now is that kind of problems : finding ways to make exec & top management understand that hiring a Community Manager is not a magic wand to solve “all the Internet problems”. Companies have to shift the way they think & decide. And this battle is a really tough one :)

  • http://www.community-roundtable.com Rachel Happe

    The value of a community manager is one of the toughest discussions out there right now. When done really well, much of the work is ‘hidden’ from view – we wrote about this in The Iceberg Effect – see: http://community-roundtable.com/2009/08/the-iceberg-effect-of-community-management. Community managers directly affect the amount of engagement but it’s hard to see/report on.

    It might be useful to do a diary of activities for a week or a month of how many members you emailed/spoke to/responded to/etc, how much content you contributed, and the like and pair that against activity. Change your level of activity for a week or longer and see how that affects community activity (although it’s usually somewhat lagging so a week may not be long enough to see direct impact).

    We compare month-over-month the content and activities we do vs. the activity generated across a number of channels and look for trends.

    And, yes – I think many people expect community managers to ‘solve all the Internet problems’ and of course, it doesn’t work that way… online issues come up because there are issues with the product/service/relationship.

    Thanks for the great comments!

  • http://www.sufuri.net quqabita

    You just nailed it. Rachel Happe. I agree with you and most comments above. It is a serious threat to the profession.

  • Pingback: links for 2009-11-04 « Sarah Hartley

  • Pingback: Footprints (11.11.09) | Chris Deary

Previous post:

Next post: