vicodin

The Economic Value of Communities

by Rachel Happe on June 11, 2010

Every time a customer submits a question or answers a question in a support forum they are creating value for an enterprise. Every time an influencer with no direct economic ties to an organization, mentions a product to someone they are creating value for the enterprise.  Every day, for large enterprises, there are millions of very small pieces of value created.  However, in most cases these little pieces of value are lost to the winds of time because they cannot be captured, centralized, and organized for re-use.  Online communities are part of the way to address this knowledge capture and distribution so that the value already being created can be extended and shared with more people.

Historically, these little bits of value were not formally recognized by organizations because the transaction cost of finding, capturing, organizing, and distributing these small bits of value was much higher than the value of the bit of information itself.  The Internet, particularly with the addition of social networks, has drastically changes the cost of information discovery, capture, and distribution making it possible for smaller and smaller bits of value to be used in an economically viable way.  And while each bit is not worth much on its own, collectively this value creation can fundamentally shift the cost of sales for an organization by creating marketing, sales, product, and support documentation faster and more accurately than the enterprise itself can.

The big trick in all of this, of course, is discovering the small bits of value, aggregating them and incenting those who are likely to continue to add value to make it even easier/cheaper for you by bringing them to both outposts and central locations where the enterprise can more easily collect, manage and distribute the information. That is not easy to do unless there is some value created to attract those individuals to your outposts or your home on the web.  The enterprise has to provide some value freely to attract whose who will create even more value.  Once this flywheel has started, the organization can shift into more of a curation than a value creation mode because participants will create value for each other.  This is the essence of online communities.  Communities are a constant process of its members creating and using value.

So what does this mean for enterprises in terms of their social strategy?  I like to think of it in economic terms and it is helpful to segment the various audiences of an enterprise and identify those segments by thinking about the ratio of value consumption to value creation.  The closer that ratio is to 1:1 (for example, employees), the closer tied to the enterprise they need to be so that all of their value creation is captured and used.  As you address audiences less connected to the organization – leads or the general public – the value proposition to capture and distribute value becomes weaker and the tactics to do that necessarily are less centrally integrated with the core business.  The implications are that employee and customer communities will produce the most value back to the organization but the cost to the organization will also be higher than for other groups.  This is interestingly, however, not how many enterprises get started with social media and online community initiatives because, while the value proposition is higher, the cost and complexity is also quite a bit higher.  So many organizations start by aggregating mentions of their brand by the general public (social listening) and using that for insight and public relationships management. This is a great way to dip the enterprise toe in the water, so to speak but it is also The Shallows, or the least valuable bits of information for the enterprise to collect and often not worth re-distribution. It has limited impact on the fundamental value structure of the enterprise (although not engaging in this way has some direct risks for public companies whose stock has been affected by public outcries).

The opportunity – and the appeal – of online communities is not that they make everyone feel better about their relationship with an organization, although that is a nice side affect, it is that they contribute tangible economic leverage back to an organization.  For companies that figure this out, they will have significant advantages in their markets but the process of building a robust and integrated enterprise ecosystem is disruptive, expensive, and challenging – and many enterprises who launch discrete support forums may not always realize that they have put one foot down on the road to changing the way the organization thinks about its value chain.

If you would like to learn more about developing and creating communities, download our report The State of Community Management or consider joining The Community Roundtable – we would love to have you.  More about membership can be found here.

  • Pingback: Lesetipps für den 15. Juni | Netzpiloten.de - das Beste aus Blogs, Videos, Musik und Web 2.0

  • https://community.emc.com/index.jspa Shapiro_susan

    Interesting article on the value of communities, the ratio of value consumption to value creation, and how this value differs in complexity and value from other forms of social media.

    However, I do disagree with the statement “Once this flywheel has started, the organization can shift into more of a curation than a value creation mode because participants will create value for each other. This is the essence of online communities.” Do others believe that established communities can run on auto-pilot or be focused on curation —rather than maintaining a continued focus on increasing engagement and the resulting value?

    • http://twitter.com/rhappe Rachel Happe

      Hi Susan -

      You make a fine point – I didn't mean to imply that *all* the content in a mature community would be member generated, only that the percentage and emphasis changes.

      Rachel

    • http://www.soshima.com Dean L

      There is a good logic in letting consumers hijack your branded community. At the end of the day, aren't they those who know what they need from your brand? At the same time, most likely lot of engaged brand evangelists inside community will have answer. And they will contribute before brand have a chance to respond. Because they want recognition. They want everyone else to acknowledge their status as 'hardcore' fans. I think brand should let most of control to community. Let them lead you. Show you the way. And all you have to do is show your constant support to passionate consumers.

      This worked for me in few cases. Australian based 4×4 community I started and nurtured had 92% of content contributed from community. This reduced our operational cost and in many cases lead us to right direction. If there was more conversation about trips and tours where you can go with family, we would build maps and related tool, so they can easily share that content. Ultimately we had amazing value from community contribution. More than we could every reached if we relied only on editorial. Or tried to control conversation. Let them hijack you.

  • http://www.ospreyvision.com/blog Steve Finikiotis

    Good post. Well said, Rachel.

  • http://neuronrobotics.com Janet Gershen-Siegel

    Interesting post – there's that moment, and it's not necessarily easy to generate or capture, when most of the content creation shifts from staff to users. Happy or at least neutral users can make the most helpful and value-adding content for an organization. Good for the Community Managers who are confident enough to let the customers speak!

    • http://www.soshima.com Dean L

      Letting customer to speak is the best way to learn about your brand. Bad or good comment – bring it on. It can't hurt. It can just improve your services or product. Right?

Previous post:

Next post: