vicodin

The Fallacy of the Organic Community

by Rachel Happe on April 25, 2011

Over the years there has been the ongoing debate about whether you can create and build a community or whether you can’t. The latest post in the camp of ‘you can’t do it’ is from Spike Jones in a post titled The Fallacy of Community.  I agree with him that the word ‘community’ gets thrown around a lot these days in a way that makes it meaningless. However, I would like to cry foul on the idea that communities just emerge from the ether.

Regardless of who starts a community, a successful community requires agency on the part of a collection of individuals and typically that starts with one particularly committed individual.  That agency could be because someone loves stamp collecting for which they have no economic model – instead they do it for fun and have other ways to feed themselves. Other people are passionate because they both enjoy something and it has economic benefit. Some people are passionate mostly because there is an economic opportunity. The reasons for starting a community – or joining one – are quite varied.

The second thing I know is that successful communities do require building. It requires someone to keep the ball moving forward and, again, that can be for either love or money – or both. Passionate people do not, together, rise up and organize themselves – even flashmobs require some planning. One of my favorite video analogies of community shows that it requires exceptional commitment by the first person in a community, and almost equal amounts of commitment from those who are first to follow:

This video often gets cut down so you get the the ‘pile on’ section faster but the truth is that one person needs to be a trailblazer (which also requires looking a bit like a fool) for a while before the movement will gain traction. And then it requires some early adopters that believe in the vision. The commitment to be that trailblazer can be supported by passion or it can be supported by an organization that has a vested interest in consolidating people with an interest in a certain topic or activity (or in the case of the dancing man, perhaps supported by a bit of drugs and/or alcohol).

What you cannot do, is build a community for which there is no interest – i.e. people who pick lint off of sweaters on Sundays. The level and amount of interest does play a critical role in the success and size of a community. But someone does have to start AND build a community.

What kind of leadership do you think is required to build a successful community?

——————————————————————————————————————–

The Community Roundtable  is committed to advancing the business of community. We offer a monthly subscription report, a membership based peer network, a community management training program and advisory services for corporations and individuals.

  • http://ariherzog.com Ari Herzog

    “…the truth is that one person needs to be a trailblazer (which also requires looking a bit like a fool) for a while before the movement will gain traction.”

    I disagree. I, too, have seen this video and its multiple angles many times and I frequently show it during my workshops on social media. But this single person did not dance to start a movement; he danced because he was compelled to dance. The crowd joined in, not because of he, but because of the third person. Three’s a crowd, remember?

    • http://twitter.com/rhappe Rachel Happe

      Hi Ari -
      I agree and my general point was that it requires agency (not necessarily the intent to start a community, although it can) and to your point, the first followers are as important as that first person.
      Thanks for stopping by and commenting.
      Rachel

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Ariane-Post/100002293304242 Ariane Post

    Hi Rachel,

    I haven’t watched the video but in any case I agree with you. Good interpretation in my eyes.

    But to be honest, I can’t see the special motivation to build a successful community. I mean, write about business, maybe you will come to an assimilable issue. You might need somebody who is the trailblazer and very often he or she will be looks like a fool. But a accepted interest is alway the basic to be succesful…
    Bulding communities is just a tool to publish or show your special interest. The leadership might depends on the kind of “business” you admire. The passionate one needs a very passionate character and the money one should be maybe a strong analytical individual…. ??

    Ariane

    • http://twitter.com/rhappe Rachel Happe

      Hi Ariane -

      I think you are right – the leader of any community needs to have the right personality for that specific community. I do think community leaders need to be trailblazers in some way however, even if they are not deeply passionate about the community topic, because they need to build a new way to do things for their organizations and that requires someone to take on a degree of personal risk.
      Thanks for the comment -
      Rachel

  • Jackson_Phil

    I agree that you cannot build community around something that is not intrinsically interesting to a group. In all the organizations I’ve worked in, “community” is largely something that has been mandated. There was nothing organic about it – people were directed to form and leadership of the group was based on position or some other existing organizational construct. Consequently, these communities became work and had limited value.

    The video is interesting to me not for it’s illustration of the way this group formed, which was clearly spontaneous (not sure if that’s the same as organic or not), but more so for the way that chaos quickly ensued. The “leader” was lost in the crowd, which in fact *stopped* dancing, the original impetus for others to join the lone dancer.

    • http://twitter.com/rhappe Rachel Happe

      Quite an interesting observation. And I completely agree that mandated groups don’t work either – the other side of the spectrum. Part of why I find community management so interesting is that you need some leadership, some structure… but not too much or all the people you were hoping to appeal to have dispersed. It’s quite a fine line to manage.

Previous post:

Next post: